Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
advertisement
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Religion
    • Travel
    • Environment
Visit Jerry Verlinger's column >>

JERRY VERLINGER

Trying to get in the middle of everything!
Articles Posted: 26  Links Seeded: 471
Member Since: 2/2008  Last Seen: 3/20/2010

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Newsvine Tools
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site
{"contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}

Stroke of Genius or Political Blunder?

News Type: Opinion — Tue Sep 2, 2008 6:38 AM EDT
politics, obama, mccain, democrats, palin, oil, campaign, alaska, polar-bears, republicansgovorner, vice-president-vp
By Jerry Verlinger
advertisement

Sarah Palin - No Surprise

John McCains choice for his Running Mate is raising a furor of controversy that is threatening to overwhelm his campaign. All eyes are now focused on this "new face" on the scene. Susan Palin, who to some political observers, is not so new, and not really quite the surprise that one would think.

On June 23, I seeded an article from AOL "3 Women Who Could Join the GOP Ticket"

The following is my comment (in part) on the article :

"In my opinion Condi Rice would do the most damage to the Obama campaign ......
....however as the article says, she is not interested. If McCain has to, or decides to pick someone else, I believe Sarah Palin would be his best choice She has the dynamics and energy that the McCain campaign needs. She also has the "political phenomenon" aura that is needed to offset the similar image that Obama projects. That's why I hope he doesn't pick her.

Post #1 - Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:18 PM EDT

Now I'm glad he did!

Did John have a Stroke of Genius?

In the aftermath of the 2006 elections, when the GOP political machine lay in shambles, one shining ray of hope emerged, in of all places, Alaska, where Sarah Palin, a young, dynamic politician was elected governor. Since then, with approval ratings in excess of 90%, she is considered perhaps the most popular Governor on the United States.

Her rise is a great (and rare) story of how adherence to principle in government, can produce political success. As recently as last year, Palin was a political outcast. She resigned in January 2004 as head of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission after complaining to the office of Governor Frank Murkowski and to state Attorney General Gregg Renkes about ethical violations by another commissioner, Randy Ruedrich, who was also Republican state chairman.

State law barred Palin from speaking out publicly about ethical violations and corruption. But she was vindicated later in 2004 when Ruedrich, who'd been reconfirmed as state chairman, agreed to pay a $12,000 fine for breaking state ethics laws. She became a hero in the eyes of the public and the press, and the bane of Republican leaders.

In 2005, she continued to take on the Republican establishment by joining Eric Croft, a Democrat, in lodging an ethics complaint against Renkes, who was not only attorney general but also a long-time adviser and campaign manager for Murkowski. The governor reprimanded Renkes and said the case was closed. It wasn't. Renkes resigned a few weeks later, and Palin was again hailed as a hero.

In 2006 she ran against Gov. Murkowski, who was seeking a second term despite sagging poll ratings, in the Republican primary. In a three-way race, Palin captured 51 percent and won in a landslide. She defeated former Democratic governor Tony Knowles in the general election, 49 percent to 41 percent. She was one of the few Republicans anywhere in the country to perform above expectations in 2006, an overwhelmingly Democratic year. Palin is a conservative and unabashedly pro life.

With her emphasis on ethics and openness in government, "it turned out Palin caught the temper of the times perfectly," wrote Tom Kizzia of the Anchorage Daily News. She was also lucky. News broke of an FBI investigation of corruption by legislators between the primary and general elections. So far, three legislators have been indicted.

In the roughly three years since she quit as the state's chief regulator of the oil industry, Palin has crushed the Republican hierarchy (virtually all male) and nearly every other foe or critic. Political analysts in Alaska refer to the "body count" of Palin's rivals.

"The landscape is littered with the bodies of those who crossed Sarah," says pollster Dave Dittman, who worked for her gubernatorial campaign. It includes Ruedrich, Renkes, Murkowski, gubernatorial contenders John Binkley and Andrew Halcro, the three big oil companies in Alaska, and a section of the Daily News called "Voice of the Times," which was highly critical of Palin and is now defunct.

However, there is the dark side.

Biggest Blunder in Modern Presidential Politics?

I've been a political puntit for some time now, I was directly involved, for a time, in New York State politics, working for a State Senator as Campaign Manager, and staffer. I've had particular interest in watching, and even being involved, on local level, in Presidential campaigns and I honestly believe, that John McCain as committed the biggest political blunder in recent Presidential politics.

I hardly know where to start in sorting the reasons why I think he should not have picked Sarah Palin. If I were working on his campaign staff. I would be flabbergasted, ... stunned .....I wouldn't know what to do, ...I'd probably quit.. I am sure, that this mistake is, without question, going to be considered the leading factor for McCains defeat if he should loose this election.

I'm not sure what factor is most important when analyzing this blunder, but one of them is, for sure, her lack of experience. Probably the most important, and for a number of reasons. I mean, she went from PTA President, to City Council member, to Mayor of Wasilla, a "Bedroom Suburb" of Anchorage, with a population of around 6,000 people. There are College Campus's bigger than that! She then, as described above, becomes the Governor of Alaska,while twice the size of Texas, has less then 700,000 people living there making it, by population, the 3rd smallest State in the Nation.

Now, McCain thinks all of a sudden, she's ready to run the entire Country! When Obama picked Biden, he said his first consideration was finding someone that is capable of being President. Someone with National and International experience. Apparently McCain doesn't think those factors are important. He obviously, chose her because of her popularity, her charisma, youth and dynamics, that's fine, but what about her political skills, her administrative skills, her foreign policy skills?

Her political skills although seemingly "well honed", amount to her so called "meteoric rise" which was due to her having "caught the temper of the times perfectly" and even with Dittmans comment that "The landscape is littered with the bodies of those who crossed Sarah," she has yet to be tested in the "Bloodbath Politics" of Washington D.C.

Her administrative skills also falls short. Her tenure as Mayor of Wasilla is hardly preparation for anything more than ..... running a small town. Wasilla's annual budget of 12 million dollars is about what Obama spends in a week on his campaign.

As for her tenure as Gov. of Alaska, I do not have the figures for the States total annual budget, but, I know Alaska does have an excellent credit rating with about 3-4 billion of debt against a 39.9 Billion Dollar Permanent fund. However, this is chump change budget management compared to the numbers she will have to deal with in Washington, where they measure debt and spending in the Trillions!

However, the real problems with her administrative skills were just beginning to emerge when McCain tapped her, apparently unvetted, for the VP slot. Her reputation as a crusading reformer after pushing through higher taxes on oil companies has been tarnished by revelations that members of her staff tried to have her former brother-in-law fired from his job as an Alaska state trooper.

State lawmakers have launched a $100,000 investigation to determine if Palin dismissed Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan last month because Monegan wouldn't fire a state trooper involved in a messy custody battle with her sister.

She also is under fire from environmentalists for opposing the Bush administration's decision in May to list the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act because global warming is melting the polar ice cap. Palin said the decision could damage the state's and nation's economy.

As far as her Foreign Policy experience goes: She had to apply for a Passport to go to Iraq to visit the Alaskan National Guard Troops serving there. Apparent she had never been out of the country prior to that. She also made a trip to Ireland. So much for Foreign Policy Experience.

We must keep in mind that, this woman, with her limited background, is going to be a heartbeat away from a man that will be 72 years old when he enters the Oval Office. Now, God forbid anything should happen to John McCain before he leaves office, should he be elected, because if it does, this Country will be in deep ka ka.

So is it Genius or Blunder? In June, based on the little I knew about her, I thought she would be a good pick. However, now that I have "vetted" her, I am going to have to vote for Blunder!

Note: The issue non-issue of her Daughters pregnancy and impending marriage will not be discussed by this author, as in my opinion it is a private family matter, and has no place in a Public Forum. Any comments on that subject will be deleted by the author.

[Information taken in part from an artilce by News Corporations "the Weekly Standard"]

Related Articles
Palin: What She Isn't and What She IsShawn GordonMon Sep 1108Comments
McCain Should Have Second Thoughts About Palincards6Mon Sep 10Comments
And I Looked And Behold A Palin Horse...Scott IsaacsSat Aug 30291Comments
Subpoenas to be issued for Troopergate probeAssociated PressMon Sep 114Comments
Mayor Palin: A Rough RecordTIMETue Sep 21Comments
{"contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Jerry Verlinger's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Centervine, Heated Debate, Left of Center, ObamaVine, Open Minded, The Big 2008 Election, Worldviews
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (11)
{"commentId":2691405,"authorDomain":"lpwillham"}
No Mcgovern repeat 08

Very good article. I often think that those of us maybe a little closer to politics than others, I have been active in politics for 25 years, held local office, worked in state government for 6 years, attended a couple of Democratic convention, tend to "overanylize" voters.

Personally as a disenchanted democrats this year. I am supporting my state and local candidates but will split my ticket for the first time to vote for McCain-Palin. I am not alone. Many moderate Democrats simply are fed up with the party being "hijacked' by the left, I supported Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 04 but this time I am fed up. I feel not only would Obama be a bad thing for our party, but a bad thing for the country.

But then I've taked the time to research him. I know all about Rezko, the 96 campaign where he disenfranchised black voters to keep other black candidates off the ballot, I know about Acorn and voter fraud. The average voter doesn't know this nor are they likely to take the time to learn. Voters tend to vote on perception on "personal connect" if you will.

Obama does not seem to have that ability to connect with 'Middle America'. he operates on higher intellectual level and doesn't relate well to average voters.

Palin accomplishes several things for McCain. First it energizes and Evangelical base who likely would have sat this election out because they were not thrilled with McCain. Second it energized his party, something that a pick like Romney wouldn't have done. Third Media attention has been totally shifted away from Obama-Biden, it greatly diminished their convention bounce. They did not get the full intended befit of that speech last Thursday as the Media isn't talking about it. Lastly , McCain having satisfied his base with Palin he can move more to the middle.

Palin need to give a good speech at the convention, she need to go out an campaign and answer the "hard" questions well.

I think within a week we will know if this was a brilliant decision. If you see upward movement in PA, OH,IN,MI for McCain-Palin, in my opinion this election is over for Obama. It will mean that she has "connected" on a personal level with "Middle America'. It really is all about the electoral college and if she connects with Middle America, they have it locked. It may be a close popular vote election, as I fully expect Obama to well on "the coasts" but Electoral College wise, they will have this locked.

A big gamble yes, but I think a good one.

{"commentId":2691405,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"lpwillham"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Sep 2, 2008 7:33 AM EDT
{"commentId":2691530,"authorDomain":"lpwillham"}
No Mcgovern repeat 08

Very good article. I often think that those of us maybe a little closer to politics than others, I have been active in politics for 25 years, held local office, worked in state government for 6 years, attended a couple of Democratic convention, tend to "overanylize" voters.

Personally as a disenchanted democrats this year. I am supporting my state and local candidates but will split my ticket for the first time to vote for McCain-Palin. I am not alone. Many moderate Democrats simply are fed up with the party being "hijacked' by the left, I supported Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 04 but this time I am fed up. I feel not only would Obama be a bad thing for our party, but a bad thing for the country.

But then I've taked the time to research him. I know all about Rezko, the 96 campaign where he disenfranchised black voters to keep other black candidates off the ballot, I know about Acorn and voter fraud. The average voter doesn't know this nor are they likely to take the time to learn. Voters tend to vote on perception on "personal connect" if you will.

Obama does not seem to have that ability to connect with 'Middle America'. he operates on higher intellectual level and doesn't relate well to average voters.

Palin accomplishes several things for McCain. First it energizes and Evangelical base who likely would have sat this election out because they were not thrilled with McCain. Second it energized his party, something that a pick like Romney wouldn't have done. Third Media attention has been totally shifted away from Obama-Biden, it greatly diminished their convention bounce. They did not get the full intended befit of that speech last Thursday as the Media isn't talking about it. Lastly , McCain having satisfied his base with Palin he can move more to the middle.

Palin need to give a good speech at the convention, she need to go out an campaign and answer the "hard" questions well.

I think within a week we will know if this was a brilliant decision. If you see upward movement in PA, OH,IN,MI for McCain-Palin, in my opinion this election is over for Obama. It will mean that she has "connected" on a personal level with "Middle America'. It really is all about the electoral college and if she connects with Middle America, they have it locked. It may be a close popular vote election, as I fully expect Obama to well on "the coasts" but Electoral College wise, they will have this locked.

A big gamble yes, but I think a good one.

{"commentId":2691530,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"lpwillham"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Sep 2, 2008 7:51 AM EDT
{"commentId":2703914,"authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
Jerry Verlinger

Thanks for the compliment.

I don't know about over analyzing the voters, it is very necessary to properly analyzing the voters, because that is the only way you can plan a campaign strategy. Over analyzing the candidates can be more of a problem. The most important thing about a candidate is the perception the voters have of that candidate. That is why it is so important to properly analyze the voters.

I agree that Palin has many attributes, however, the average voter is not going to research her background, they are going to make a judgement, based on the perception they formulate about her in the limited amount of time they have to gather information about her. Keep in mind that most people work, and only spend a small amount of time listening to the news and even less time analyzing it.

I believe that most people are going to evaluate, whether or not Susan Palin is ready, and if they are ready for her to be President of the United States, given John McCains age. I believe, for the most part, they will think not.

Her speech is not going to help, no matter what she says, because more than one person has commented to me, that the voice she will say it with, is too high pitched and annoying. (and I thought it was just me)

{"commentId":2703914,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
    #2.1 - Tue Sep 2, 2008 6:32 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2712385,"authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
    Jerry Verlinger

    I believe that most people are going to evaluate, whether or not Susan Palin is ready

    Make that Sarah Palin.

    (Gimme a break, ...... she's new!)

    {"commentId":2712385,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
      #2.2 - Wed Sep 3, 2008 1:13 AM EDT
      {"commentId":3193529,"authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
      Jerry Verlinger

      I just caught your comment (9/29).

      I caught my self calling her Susan a couple of times, I have an acquaintance named Susan Palen, which causes me to make that mistake. I realized, a day or two after posting that comment, that

      Its fixed I had been calling er Susan, and had one so in a comment, but I couldn't remember what comment.

      Well you just found the answer for me.

      Anyway, now, 10 days later, I think dhe is going to bring Mc Cain down.

      And, it's too late to stop it. If she where to step down right now, he may be able to put Rommeny or even Ron Paul in her place.

      Personally, I think Ron Paul would be the only choice that would ceate enough excitement in the media to draw much need media attention to McCain.

      I do not see the American people, looking at Sarah Palin, and envisioning her in the Oval Office, making life and death decisions for this nation.

      She is just not ready, McCain is 72 years old, and the media is going to remind us of that in every article the publish about him. Te voters are going to react and Obama will win.

      If McCain wins, we will have "The George Bush of the Future" in the White House, with "George Bush in Drag" in the wings.

      Those, are scary thoughts!

      {"commentId":3193529,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
        #2.3 - Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:30 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":2694034,"authorDomain":"prosperity2un2000"}
        Neesy08

        BLUNDER!!!!!!!!
        TWO NEW POLLS OUT TODAY!!!
        PALIN IS OT HELPING MCCAIN! OBAMA HAS EVEN WIDER LEAD!!!http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/two_more_polls_show_obamas_lea.php

        {"commentId":2694034,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"prosperity2un2000"}
        • 2 votes
        Reply#3 - Tue Sep 2, 2008 11:12 AM EDT
        {"commentId":2704325,"authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
        Jerry Verlinger

        Don't get too over confident Neesy08, Barak did not get a bounce from Biden either. If you want Oboma to win this race, you will have to support him right to the wire.

        Just as clo says, (next comment) "the polls change every day"

        But clo is wrong about the "wide" spread. There will be no "wide spread" in either direction. This country is about evenly divided on almost every major issue, and this election is no different.

        In "travels" around the Vine, I find that supporters for each side feel their guy is a "shoo in".

        "Don't beleive it" as the high speed satalite girl says, it's going to be a tight race, support your guy till the end if you want him to win.

        "Your welcome!"

        {"commentId":2704325,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
          #3.1 - Tue Sep 2, 2008 6:54 PM EDT
          Reply
          {"commentId":2697219,"authorDomain":"bclowater"}
          clo

          The polls will change from day to day until election day. I believe it will not be as close as some think. McCain will win by a large spread.

          {"commentId":2697219,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"bclowater"}
          • 2 votes
          Reply#4 - Tue Sep 2, 2008 1:12 PM EDT
          {"commentId":2704369,"authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
          Jerry Verlinger

          There will be no "wide spread" in either direction. This country is about evenly divided on almost every major issue, and this election is no different. (In my opinion)

          {"commentId":2704369,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
            #4.1 - Tue Sep 2, 2008 6:57 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":2703611,"authorDomain":"ckguyfromsi"}
            charlie-268870

            As a Reagan Democrat I have voted for Reagan, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. in addition to most Republican nominees for Congressional and Senatorial offices.

            Like many other Americans, I am fed up with the Republican promises for SMALLER government, lower taxes etc. The Bush administration and a Republican lead House have created the worst deficit spending this country has ever seen, decreased taxes for the wealthiest Americans, altered the balance of power in favor of the Executive office, encroached upon civil liberties in the name of security and forced the shadow of fundamentalist Christianity into their legislation with programs such as Faith based initiatives.

            Obama is not my favorite choice, but I'm voting for him just like I voted for Bush as the lesser of two evils when he ran against Kerry in 2004!

            {"commentId":2703611,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"ckguyfromsi"}
            • 1 vote
            Reply#5 - Tue Sep 2, 2008 6:14 PM EDT
            {"commentId":2704801,"authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
            Jerry Verlinger

            Obama is not my favorite choice, but I'm voting for him just like I voted for Bush as the lesser of two evils when he ran against Kerry in 2004!

            You sure have big one Charlie, not too many people around admit they voted for Bush. (Joke)

            I wasn't too keen on Kerry either, but how could you have thought anyone could be worse than Bush, after his performance in the first 4 years?

            Your right on about the deficit spending and the decreased taxes for the wealthiest Americans.
            Bush has for sure assumed too much power in the Executive office, and has,as you say, "encroached upon civil liberties in the name of security and forced the shadow of fundamentalist Christianity into their legislation with programs such as Faith based initiatives".

            I think many people will be surprised at how much Omama will be able to get Americans motivated fix this countries problems, if he wins this very tight race.

            {"commentId":2704801,"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418","authorDomain":"Jerry611"}
              #5.1 - Tue Sep 2, 2008 7:17 PM EDT
              Reply
              {"canLink":false,"threadId":"345927","isPrivate":false}
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
              (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
              Newsvine Privacy Statement
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              {"threadId":"345927","contentId":"1811418"}
              Start TrackingStart Tracking
              Stop TrackingStop Tracking
              Back To Top | Front Page
              FUN STUFF:
              • Leaderboard |
              • E-Mail Alerts |
              • Top of the Vine |
              • Newsvine Live |
              • Newsvine Archives |
              • The Greenhouse |
              • Newsvine Tools
              COMPANY STUFF:
              • Code of Honor |
              • Company Info |
              • Contact Us |
              • Jobs |
              • User Agreement |
              • Privacy Policy
              LEGAL STUFF:
              • © 2005-2010 Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com